WWW.51LUNWEN.COM 无忧论文网
蜂朝集团总站|英语论文网|免费论文网|论文导航网 英国·澳大利亚·新西兰·加拿大·美国
无忧论文网无忧论文网名校师资提供一流服务
2008/8/22 星期五
论文首页 | 论文下载 | 论文写作 | 论文老师 | 论文代写 | 论文发表 | 发表杂志 | 发表供需 | 翻译服务 | 支付方式
  论文出售 | 留学论文 | 论文格式 | 硕士论文 | MBA论文 | 金融硕士| 博士论文 | 本科论文 | 教育导航 我的无忧  
经济论文|社会哲学|英语论文|新闻媒体|历史文学|保险论文|会计审计|法律论文|艺术论文|工程论文|化工冶金|机械自动|能源动力|电子信息|计算机科|土建论文|航空气象|生命环境|物理论文|地理地质|数学论文|医学论文|农业科学|交通运输|消防安全|考古论文|工商管理|行政政治|工程项目|公共管理|教学论文|教育论文|应用范文|财务范文|合同样本|政工类文|法律法规|网络营销|论文写作|留学文书|英语翻译|法语翻译|
蜂朝无忧论文网论文下载中心 [法律论文][国际商法]Takeover Law Reforms in Australia and in China
本类导航  
法律论文
 →环境法
 →刑法
 →版权法
 →国际商法
 →法学理论
 →行政法
 →法学其他
 →民法
 →诉讼法
 →经济法
 →海事海商法
 →法律史
 →公司法
 →民商法
 →婚姻法
 →票据法
 →森林法
 →商标法
 →宪法
 →新闻法
 →食品安全法
本专业最热门的论文
Electronic Money and Relevant Legal and Regulatory Issues(7531)
Conflict between Free Trade and Environment Protection------where we go and what we do tomorrow (6415)
International Commercial Arbitration in Net Era(4013)
Speach:Invest to Chinas logistics and shipping industry - key legal issues(3406)
Takeover Law Reforms in Australia and in China(2812)

Google 英语论文 硕士论文 论文下载 论文发表
论文题目: Takeover Law Reforms in Australia and in China
论文编号: lw200701122208173060
论文属性: 课程论文
论文国籍:
论文语言:英文
登出日期: 2007-01-12  
点击次数:2811
论文字数:1800
购买价格: 免费论文
论文大纲,目录
关键词搜索:国际商法论文   课程论文
Takeover Law Reforms in Australia and in China

Both Australian company law and Chinese company law have been dramatically changed in the last decade and are still being changed. The CLERP Act 1999, which came into force on 13th March 2000, made significant changes to the Corporations Law (CL). While the Securities Law of China, which commenced on 1st July 1999, is a milestone in the development of Chinese company law. Both the CLERP Act of Australia and the Securities Law of China changed the takeover provisions in respective jurisdictions. This short essay is to outline these changes and their impacts and interactions.

CLERP Act 1999: takeover law reform and its impacts in Australia

The takeover legislation in Australia can be traced back to the takeovers code introduced by the Uniform Companies Code in 1961. This legislation was significantly revised in 1971 with the introduction of the Eggleston Principles. The Eggleston Principles was subsequently carried forward into the Companies (Acquisition of Shares) Act 1980, and the provisions of this legislation were largely re-enacted in CL.

Before the CLERP Act was enacted, CL had been changed more than a dozen of times, but takeover provisions were almost the same although the Simplification Task Force had planned to reform them relating to relevant interests, associate relationships and entitlements.(1) After the CLERP replaced the Corporate Law Simplification Program, the endeavour to reform the takeover provis无忧论文 【http://www.uklunwen.com】ions continued, and the emphasis was moved to facilitate a more efficient market for corporate control because the objective of the CLERP was "to ensure that business regulation is consistent with promoting a strong and vibrant economy and provides a framework which assists business in adapting to change".(2) The CLERP brings an economic focus to corporate law reform. As a part of the CLERP, takeover law reforms accordingly were designed to achieve an appropriate balance between facilitating efficient corporate control while ensuring a sound investor protection regime, particularly for minority investors.

The CLERP Act has repealed the whole of Chapter 6 of CL, and inserted new Chapter 6 together with Chapters 6A, 6B, 6C and 6D, of which Chapter 6 deals with the acquisition of shares and takeovers, Chapter 6A deals with compulsory acquisitions and buy-outs. Chapter 6 begins with the purposes of the takeover rules with Eggleston Principles incorporated. It also extends takeover regulation to listed managed investment schemes and listed bodies. The main reforms are summarised as follows.

The CLERP Act makes the Corporations and Securities Panel the primary forum for the resolution of takeover disputes during the bid period. All interested parties may bring matters before the Panel, not just the ASC. Any aggrieved party has a right of appeal from a Panel decision to an appeal division of the Panel. The Panel is empowered to make a declaration of unacceptable circumstance
第1页 第2页 第3页 第4页 第5页 第6页 第7页 
上一篇:Conflict between F下一篇:Is the Corporation
最新论文 最热门论文
战略管理会计的兴起与发展
关于我国管理会计应用若干问题思考
企业战略管理的战略思维比较
论管理会计的技术观与社会文化观
关于战略管理会计基本架构的思考
校园网站设计
英语专业毕业论文-英语委婉语的交际功能
图书馆管理系统
英语毕业论文:Collaborative Principled Negotiation
论英汉翻译中的“直译”与“意译”现象
论文首页】【设为主页】【加入收藏】【打印本文】【回到顶部
 
 
Copyright (c) 2002 ~ 2009 蜂朝集团旗下网站. All rights reserved.